Essay on Sartre’s “Man Is Condemned to Be Free” Essay

When Sartre writes that macrocosm is condemned to be free, he is elaborating on the contention adult male is responsible for eachthing he does. Provided that paragon does not exist, man must live his condemned life of freedom without every values or commands that could legitimize his behavior.Furthermore, man has no stiffs of justification or cause man has no excuse for his actions, because he has chosen them on his own, out of his own freedom. Although freedom is traditionally peculiarity of good, Sartre describes it almost as a burden, because of his belief that God does not exist. When man discovers that he is without excuse, he has engender to realize that he cannot find anything to depend on for without God, everything is permitted.Also, because there is no outside force driving every man, each man as an case-by-case is responsible for shaping the image of man, or even outing man. expect that God in the heavens is not pose out the future and that we are all respon sible for ourselves, at every instant man is condemned to invent man, for there is no definition of man yet what we show it pg. 380, textbook.Furthermore, Sartre explains how each man creates his own morality. Because every man is free to do what they want and make their own decisions, they sometimes are put in a situation where they must choose mingled with two different modes of action pg. 381, textbook. If God existed and do the future as he wanted it, man would not have to make these decisions. In choosing among these two paths, man must create what he really believes in. This is choosing morality.In choosing, man develops his own moral philosophy and beliefs which result in his individual path of principles. Obviously, in some situations you may have chosen otherwise than another person, proving that something that means a lot to iodin person may in turn mean nothing to you.